Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings

ABSTRACT

A coating composition is provided comprising
     (a) an aqueous medium, (b) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a melting temperature of at least 290° C., (c) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a melting temperature of no greater than 270° C., and (d) water miscible organic liquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280° C. and optionally (e) filler, the combination of (c) and (d) providing sloughing resistance to said composition applied to a non-horizontal substrate and baked, component (d) being unnecessary when component (a) is not present in the coating composition, and when filler is present the amount of (c) being present in an effective amount to increase the cohesive strength of the baked layer of the coating composition.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a DIV of application Ser. No. 13/089,637, filed onApr. 9, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,889,779, which claims benefit to U.S.provisional application No. 61/347,833, filed on May 25, 2010.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to increasing the adhesion between primer andovercoat layer forming a non-stick coating on a substrate and toincreasing the cohesive strength of the overcoat layer.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789 discloses a lining adhered to the interiorsurface of an oil well pipe, also known as oil production tube ordown-hole oil pipe, the lining including a primer layer and an overcoatlayer on the primer layer, the overcoat providing a non-stickperfluoropolymer surface. In a preferred embodiment, the primer layer isformed by spraying a liquid-based primer composition onto the interiorsurface of the pipe and drying or baking the primer composition to formthe primer layer, followed by spraying a liquid composition onto theprimer layer and drying and baking this composition to form the overcoatlayer. This lining has performed admirably in oil well application,preventing the plugging of the oil well pipe by deposition ofasphaltenes, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale present in the oilflowing through the pipe

A water-miscible organic liquid with a high boiling temperature, notablyglycerin, which boils at 291° C., is included in the overcoatcomposition of U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789 in a substantial amount toprevent the dried coating, prior to baking, from sloughing off of theprimer layer within the interior of the pipe wherein the cylindricalsurface is mostly non-horizontal. U.S. Pat. No. 5,502,097 discloses theuse of such high boiling liquid in the coating composition to preventsloughing off of the coating from a vertical surface. The interior ofoil well pipe presents a continuum of surface varying from thenon-horizontal, including vertical and overhanging (upper), looking downon the lower surface of the pipe. This sloughing off of the driedcoating from non-horizontal surface is a problem, especially if the pipebeing lined is moved or impacted during drying, until the baking of thedried layer fuses the perfluoropolymer present in the layer, resultingin the overcoat adhering to the primer layer. While the high boilingorganic liquid is effective in resisting sloughing, its boilingtemperature is less than that of the baking temperature, whereby theliquid volatilizes, often resulting in excessive smoking (fuming) of thelayer. There is a need for solving the sloughing problem without havingto volatilize so much organic liquid.

While, the pipe lining of U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789 performs admirablywell in oil well operation, there are occasions in oil recovery ormaintenance of the oil well pipe that the interior of the pipe isexposed to pressurization and rapid decompression. U.S. PatentPublication 2009/0078328 discloses an Autoclave Test simulating theeffect pressurization and rapid decompression on a pipe having anon-stick lining. The autoclave contains test fluids, liquid and gas,comparable to those encountered in an oil well and a non-stick liningthat would be used for oil well pipe. The lining is formed from a primerlayer on the metal surface, which could be that of the interior of thepipe, and an inner layer adhered to the primer layer and an outer layeradhered to the inner layer. The combination of the inner layer and outerlayer is the overcoat for the primer layer. Pressurization forces testfluids to permeate into the coating, and rapid decompression results inthe rapid exit of these penetrated fluids from the coating, causingblistering (layer separation) within the coating, namely between theprimer layer and the inner layer of the overcoat. This blisteringrepresents locations for potential corrosive attack and coating failurein actual service, wherein the coating forms the interior surface of oilwell pipe. There is a need to increase the adhesion between the primerlayer and overcoat of the pipe lining so that the lining has greaterresistance to blistering should the occasion of rapid decompression ofthe pressurized interior of the lined pipe arise in actual down-holeservice.

The outer layer of the oil pipe lining of U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789 maycontain particles that form a mechanical barrier against the permeationof water, solvents, and gases. While these particles are effective inprotecting the metal surface of the pipe underlying the non-stickcoating from corrosion, the coating is nevertheless susceptible toblistering upon rapid decompression. Apparently enough fluid permeatesinto the lining to give this disadvantageous result. While the presenceof the permeation barrier particles, usually platelet in shape, protectsthe underlying pipe surface from corrosion, the inner layer of theovercoat containing these particles, exhibit decreased cohesivestrength. Cohesive strength is the strength of the layer within itself,i.e. the ability if the layer to retain its integrity under stress, incontrast to the strength of the bond between the inner layer andadjacent layers. As a result of this reduced cohesive strength, thelining is subject to delamination from physical abuse that may beencountered in down-hole operation, for example being struck by adown-hole tool inserted into the pipe. This delamination has been foundto be a failure within the thickness of the overcoat, i.e. within theinner layer of the lining of U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789, by separation ofthe fluoropolymer constituent of the inner layer from the surface of theparticles lying within the inner layer. The location of thisdelamination then becomes a point for corrosive attack on the underlyingpipe surface and a loss of non-stick character inviting the buildup andplugging from one or more of asphaltenes, wax and inorganic scale. Thereis a need to increase the cohesive strength of the layer containing thebarrier particles.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention in its various embodiments provides a non-stickcoating or lining that satisfies all these needs.

Embodiment A of the present invention is directed at reducing theemission of volatiles from the coating during baking of the coating,without loss of sloughing resistance from non-horizontal surfaces onwhich the coating is applied. This embodiment can be defined as acoating composition that resists sloughing from a non-horizontal metalsubstrate prior to baking, with the components comprising (a) an aqueousmedium, (b) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueousmedium and having a melting temperature of at least 290° C., and asloughing-resistant amount of the combination of (c) melt-fabricableperfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a meltingtemperature of no greater than 270° C. and (d) water miscible organicliquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280° C.

Another aspect of this embodiment is the composition of the baked layerof this composition on the metal substrate. Baking drives off all lowerboiling materials present in the as-applied composition. Thus,components (a) and (d) would no longer be present in the baked layer.Another component that would not be present in any significant amount isheat resistant polymer binder that is used in primer layer compositionsto adhere the primer layer to a metal substrate. This would not bepresent in the baked layer because the composition of embodiment A isessentially free of such polymer binder, the baked layer formed fromembodiment A therefore requiring a primer layer to be first applied tothe metal substrate, on which the composition of embodiment A is thenapplied. The baking to form the overcoat layer of this composition thuscomprises fusing said melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers of (b) and (c).

The result of the baking of the overcoat layer and thus the primer layerif not already baked is the aspect of embodiment A wherein the metalsubstrate has a non-stick lining comprising a primer layer on the metalsubstrate and an overcoat layer on the primer layer, the overcoat layercomprising melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a meltingtemperature of at least 290° C. and melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c)having a melting temperature of no greater than 270° C. This aspect ofembodiment A produces the surprising result of increasing rapiddecompression adhesion between the primer layer and the overcoat layer.The amount of melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a meltingtemperature of no greater than 270° C. present in the baked layer isthat which is effective to produce this improvement, whereby this aspectof embodiment A produces a baked layer that has improved resistance toblistering when the lining is subjected to rapid decompression.

Embodiment B is directed to increasing the cohesive strength of thelayer obtained from the composition, either as applied and eventuallybaked, of embodiment A, when such composition contains permeationbarrier particles. This embodiment can be defined as a coatingcomposition that provides an overcoat layer for a non-stick coating on ametal substrate, comprising (b) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer havinga melting temperature of at least 290° C., (c) melt-fabricableperfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C., and (e) filler, the presence of filler in said overcoat layerweakening the cohesive strength of said overcoat layer when (c) is notpresent, the amount of (c) being present being an effective amount toincrease the cohesive strength of said overcoat layer. The filler is thebarrier particles. In this embodiment, the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c)are the same as the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) of embodiment A. Theovercoat layer made from the composition of embodiment B also requires aprimer layer on the metal substrate in order for the overcoat to form anadherent non-stick coating

Common to both embodiments A and B is the beneficial effect of addingmelt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of nogreater than 270° C. to the composition to be applied to the primerlayer-coated metal substrate, whereby this polymer is also present inthe baked layer formed from this composition. In embodiment A, thislower melting perfluoropolymer replaces most of the water immisciblehigh boiling organic liquid as the anti-sloughing additive to thecomposition, thereby reducing organic volatiles in the baking step, andprovides the further beneficial effect of improved resistance toblistering as described above. While the water miscible organic liquidhaving a boiling temperature of at least 280° C. is a required componentin the as-applied composition in embodiment A, it is not required whenthe metal substrate has the shape that avoids the sloughing problem. Inthat event, the baked layer having improved resistance to blisteringunder rapid decompression is obtained without using the high boilingorganic liquid. The same is true for the as-applied composition ofembodiment B, which can be applied as a powder coating, thereby notrequiring the as-applied composition to be in the form of a liquidmedium, or if in the form of a liquid medium, the liquid can be organicor aqueous. Filler is present in the composition of embodiment B,whereby the presence of melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) having amelting temperature of no greater than 270° C. provides the improvedcohesive strength to the overcoat layer.

Thus, the present invention can be described as the use ofperfluoropolymer (c) to reduce sloughing in the context of embodiment A,or to reduce or eliminate blistering (rapid decompression adhesion) alsoin the context of embodiment A, even when liquid (d) is not present. Thepresent invention can also be described as the use of perfluoropolymer(c) to increase cohesive strength in the context of embodiment B. Theseimprovements arising from the use of perfluoropolymer (c) can beseparately sought and obtained or collectively sought and obtained inthe compositions of the present invention. These uses ofperfluoropolymer (c) also apply to the many embodiments of metalsubstrates described hereinafter, such as metal pipes, preferably oilwell pipe and heat exchanger pipe, especially forming the interiorsurface thereof. These uses on metal substrates also apply to theapplication of the compositions of embodiments A and B.

A preferred embodiment of the present invention when the non-stickcoating on a metal substrate forms the interior surface of a metal pipe(tube), is the as-applied composition that is the combination ofembodiments A and B i.e. that contains both the filler (e) and the watermiscible organic liquid (d) having a boiling temperature of at least280° C.

The amounts of each component of each composition of the presentinvention will depend on the application intended and improvementdesired as will be discussed hereinafter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The components used in the compositions of the present invention willfirst be described, followed by description of the use of thesecomponents in the compositions of the embodiments of the presentinvention.

Both the perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least290° C., and the perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature of nogreater than 270° C. are melt fabricable. By melt fabricable is meantthat the fluoropolymer is sufficiently flowable in the molten state thatit can be fabricated by melt processing such as extrusion, to produceproducts having sufficient strength so as to be useful. This meltflowability enables the compositions to be fused in the baking step toform tough pin-hole free layers. The sufficient strength characteristicof melt fabricability can be characterized by the fluoropolymer byitself exhibiting an MIT Flex Life of at least 1000 cycles, preferablyat least 2000 cycles using 8 mil (0.21 mm) thick compression moldedfilm. In the MIT Flex Life test, the film is gripped between jaws and isflexed back and forth over a 135° range in accordance with ASTM D 2176.

With respect to the perfluoropolymer (b) having a melt temperature of atleast 290° C., examples of this melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer are thecopolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether)(PAVE) in which the linear or branched alkyl group contains 1 to 5carbon atoms. These perfluoropolymers are partially crystallinefluoroplastics and are not perfluoroelastomers and are commonly known asPFA. By partially crystalline is meant that the polymers have somecrystallinity and are characterized by a detectable melting pointmeasured according to ASTM D 3418, and a melting endotherm of at leastabout 3 J/g.

Preferred PAVE monomers are those in which the alkyl group contains 1,2, 3 or 4 carbon atoms, respectively known as perfluoro(methyl vinylether) (PMVE), perfluoro(ethyl vinyl ether) (PEVE), perfluoro(propylvinyl ether) (PPVE), and perfluoro(butyl vinyl ether) (PBVE). Thecopolymer can be made using several PAVE monomers, such as theTFE/perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether)/perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether)copolymer, sometimes called MFA by the manufacturer, but included as PFAherein. The selection of the PAVE monomer(s) for copolymerization withTFE and their amount is such that the melting temperature of theresulting perfluoropolymer is at least 290° C., preferably at least 300°C., but typically no greater than 310° C. for best melt flowability topin-hole free layers. The PAVE monomer PPVE lowers the meltingtemperature of the PFA less than when the PAVE monomer s PEVE, wherebyPPVE is the preferred monomer for copolymerization with TFE to form highmelting PFA. PFA has a high thermal stability, and the higher itsmelting temperature, the greater is its integrity in use as linings athigh temperature. To obtain the high melting PFA, generally the PAVEcontent will be no greater than 10 wt %, no greater than 7 wt % toachieve a melt temperature of at least 300° C., and its minimum contentwill be at least 1.5 wt % to provide the melt flowability needed formelt fabricability, the remainder to total 100 wt % being TFE. The meltflow rate (MFR) of the PFA is preferably at least 0.1 g/10 min,preferably at least 5 g/10 min, as measured according to ASTM D-1238 andASTM D 3307-93, at 372° C. using a 5 kg weight on the molten PFA.

The melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature ofat least 290° C. is not polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or PTFEmicropowder. Neither of these polymers are melt fabricable. PTFE is notmelt fabricable because it does not flow in the molten state. Thisnon-melt flowability arises from the extremely high molecular weight ofthe PTFE, i.e. at least 1,000,000, and the accompanying high meltviscosity. The non-melt flowability of the PTFE can also becharacterized by high melt creep viscosity, sometimes called specificmelt viscosity, which involves the measurement of the rate of elongationof a molten sliver of PTFE under a known tensile stress for 30 min, asfurther described in and determined in accordance with U.S. Pat. No.6,841,594, referring to the specific melt viscosity measurementprocedure of U.S. Pat. No. 3,819,594. In this test, the molten slivermade in accordance with the test procedure is maintained under load for30 min, before the measurement of melt creep viscosity is begun, andthis measurement is then made during the next 30 min of applied load.The PTFE preferably has a melt creep viscosity of at least about 1×10⁶Pa·s, more preferably at least about 1×10⁷ Pa·s, and most preferably atleast about 1×10⁸ Pa·s, all at 380° C. The fact that the creep of thesliver can be measured under this condition, means that the sliverremained intact during the creep test, instead of elongating to ruptureif the sliver (PTFE) were melt flowable. PTFE micropowder is meltflowable, because it is low molecular weight PTFE, but it is not meltfabricable. This melt flowable PTFE, which has an MFR that is measurableby ASTM D 1238-94a, is obtained by direct polymerization underconditions that prevent very long polymer chains from forming, or byirradiation degradation of non-melt flowable PTFE. PTFE micropowder isnot melt fabricable because the article molded from the melt is useless,by virtue of extreme brittleness. Because of its low molecular weight(relative to non-melt-flowable PTFE), it has no strength. An extrudedfilament of the PTFE micropowder is so brittle that it breaks uponflexing. Compression molded film for the MIT flex life test generallycannot be made from PTFE micropowder, i.e. the film tends to crack inthe mold. Any intact portions of the film crack when flexed.

With respect to the perfluoropolymer (c) component, this fluoropolymeris preferably a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) andhexafluoropropylene (HFP), typically referred to as FEP. In thesecopolymers, the HFP content is typically about 6-17 wt %, preferably9-17 wt % (calculated from HFPI×3.2). HFPI is the ratio of infraredradiation (IR) absorbances at specified IR wavelengths as disclosed inU.S. Statutory Invention Registration H130. Preferably, the TFE/HFPcopolymer includes a small amount of additional comonomer to improveproperties. The preferred TFE/HFP copolymer is TFE/HFP/perfluoro(alkylvinyl ether) (PAVE), wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to 4 carbonatoms. Preferred PAVE monomers are perfluoro(ethyl vinyl ether) (PEVE)and perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) (PPVE). Preferred TFE/HFP copolymerscontaining the additional comonomer have an HFP content of about 6-17 wt%, preferably 9-17 wt % and PAVE content, preferably PEVE, of about 0.2to 3 wt %, with the remainder of the copolymer being TFE to total 100 wt% of the copolymer. Examples of FEP compositions are those disclosed inU.S. Pat. No. 4,029,868 (Carlson), U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,404 (Blair), andU.S. Pat. No. 6,541,588 (Kaulbach et al.) and in U.S. StatutoryInvention Registration H130. The FEP is partially crystalline as definedabove, that is, it is not a fluoroelastomer.

The composition of the FEP described above is chosen so the its melttemperature of no greater than 270° C., preferably no greater than 265°C. so that this copolymer commences melting before the high boilingorganic liquid is completely volatilized from the layer being baked.This melting holds the layer in place, not allowing it to slough off ofthe primer layer before baking is complete. It is also preferred thatthe FEP have a melting temperature of at least 250° C., more preferablyat least 255° C., to provide the highest thermal stability for thecopolymer. Thus, the melting temperature range for this lower meltingperfluoropolymer component can be 250-270° C., 255-270° C., 250-265° C.or 255-265° C., and any of these lower melting perfluoropolymers can beused in the composition along with the perfluoropolymer having a meltingtemperature of at least 290° C. or at least 300° C.

The perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) present in the composition ispreferably in the form of a powder, which is an agglomeration ofsubmicrometer-size dispersion-polymerized particles formed in an aqueousmedium (a). The powder is preferably obtained by spray drying theaqueous medium containing the dispersion polymerized perfluoropolymerparticles as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,418,349. As disclosed in thispatent, the powder formed by the spray drying comprises friable granulesof agglomerated primary particles (as polymerized). The friable natureof the granules gives them a high bulk density, e.g. at least 20 g/100cc and a lower specific surface area (SSA), 1-6 g/m², than the 10-12m²/g for the as-polymerized dispersed primary particles of theperfluoropolymer. SSA is measured as described in this patent. At thetime of the patenting of the invention of U.S. Pat. No. 6,518,329, theaverage particle size of the powder produced by the spray drying was 5to 100 micrometers, which could be reduced by densifying and comminutionas disclosed in the patent. The perfluoropolymer powder used in thepresent invention can be as spray dried or densified, with the preferredaverage particle size being 2 to 100 micrometers, more preferably, 2 to60 micrometers.

While the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are preferably in the form ofpowders as described above, they can also be in the form ofas-polymerized submicrometer-size primary particles. The powder form,however, provides the advantage of promoting the high viscosity desiredfor the liquid form of the coating composition for achieving thickovercoat layer thicknesses, i.e. at least 30 micrometers thick.

With respect to the water miscible high boiling organic liquid (d)having a boiling temperature of at least 280° C., examples of suchliquids include glycerin and polyethylene glycol and mixtures thereof.These liquids impart sloughing resistance to the layer being formed onnon-horizontal surfaces by drying the composition and before the bakingtemperature is reached. When the baking temperature reaches the boilingtemperature of the organic liquid, the liquid volatilizes withoutleaving any measurable residue in the layer. The baking temperature forthe lining will generally be between 360-410° C., depending on layerthickness and time of baking desired, without decomposing any of theperfluoropolymers present in the lining. The baking step is well abovethe melting temperatures of the perfluoropolymers in the composition,whereby they flow and fuse together to form a pin-hole free layer. Theboiling temperature of the organic liquid will be at least 10° C. lessthan the baking temperature for the layer and thus the lining, generallyno greater than 340° C. The volatilization of the high boiling organicliquid is accompanied by the emission of smoke from the coating (lining)during baking. The present invention provides for greatly reduced smokeemission, by enabling the amount of high boiling organic liquid to bereduced without loss of sloughing resistance by virtue of the presenceof the fluoropolymer (c) in the composition forming the baked layer.

With respect to the filler component (e), these are particles that arepreferably platelet in shape to provide the most effective mechanicalbarrier to permeation of gases and liquids through the thickness of thelayer containing this filler, thereby protecting the metal substratefrom corrosion. Examples of platelet-shaped filler include glass flakesand mica, including mica particles coated with an oxide layer like ironor titanium oxide. The platelet particles will be small in size so as tobe containable within the thickness of the layer containing theseparticles. Thus, these particles will generally have an average particlesize (diameter) of about 10 to 200 microns, preferably 20-100 microns,with no more than 50% of the particles of flake having average particlesize of more than about 300 microns. The thickness of the platelets willbe less than the diameter, usually at least ⅕ the diameter, and mostoften no greater than 5 micrometers in thickness. Mica particles whichcoated with oxide layer that can be used in the present inventioninclude those described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,087,827 (Klenke andStratton); U.S. Pat. No. 3,087,828 (Linton); and U.S. Pat. No. 3,087,829(Linton). The micas described in these patents are coated with oxides orhydrous oxides of titanium, zirconium, aluminum, zinc, antimony, tin,iron, copper, nickel, cobalt, chromium, or vanadium. Mixtures of coatedmicas can also be used.

Examples of other components that can be present in compositions of thepresent invention, include thickeners such as acrylic polymer, lowboiling organic solvents, e.g. those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.7,575,789 having a boiling temperature of 50 to 200° C., and dispersingagents. All of these other components are fugitive in the sense they arevolatilized away from the layer during the baking step.

The aqueous medium is primarily or entirely water depending on whetherthe composition is embodiment A or embodiment B, and includes thesolution of other soluble components in the water. In the calculation ofcomposition wt % s, however, aqueous medium (a) is considered to beentirely of water.

The coating compositions of embodiments A and B will not contain anysignificant amount of non-fluorinated heat resistant (thermally stable)polymer binder. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789, this polymerbinder is present in the primer layer to adhere it to the metalsubstrate. The compositions of the present invention do not containenough of such polymer binder to serve as a primer layer, whereby layersformed from these compositions require that a primer layer be formed onthe metal substrate for adhering said coating composition to saidsurface. Examples of primer layers are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.7,575,789. Thus, the baked layer(s) from the coating compositions of thepresent invention that are formed on the primer layer will beessentially free of heat-resistant polymer binder. A small amount ofpolymer binder can be present in the coating composition to modify anadhesion property between overcoat and primer layer, but preferably noheat-resistant polymer binder is present in either the coatingcompositions of the present invention or in the baked layers obtainedtherefrom. If a small amount of heat-resistant polymer binder ispresent, such amount will preferably be no greater than 20% of the totalweight of perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) in the composition for bothembodiments A and B, more preferably no greater than 10 wt %, mostpreferably no greater than 5 wt %.

The preferred primer contains both perfluoropolymer along with aneffective amount of heat-resistant polymer binder to adhere the layerformed from the primer to the metal substrate. The preferredperfluoropolymer in the primer layer is perfluoropolymer (c), mostpreferably, FEP. In this regard, the perfluoropolymer or FEP content ofthe primer is preferably at least 80% of the entire perfluoropolymercontent of the primer, more preferably at least 90 wt %, and mostpreferably, 100%.

With respect to embodiment A, the compositions in this embodiment canuse any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a meltingtemperature of at least 290° C. described above as component (b) and anyof the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a melting temperature ofno greater than 270° C. described above as component (c) dispersed inaqueous medium (a). The coating composition preferably contains about2-15 wt % of the combination of (c) and (d) with respect to the sum ofcomponents (a), (b), (c) and (d), and preferably the amount of (c) plus(d) is at least 3 wt % and does not exceed 10 wt %. The amount of (d) ispreferably 0.5 to 3 wt %, and the amount of (c) is preferably 1 to 8 wt%, more preferably 1 to 4 wt %, all based on the sum of (a), (b), (c),and (d). U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789 discloses the presence of 8.3 wt %glycerin in the coating composition (Table 4). It has been found thatequivalent sloughing resistance can be obtained with the combination ofno more than 2 wt % component (d) together with no more than 3 wt %component (c), based on the sum of components (a), (b), (c) and (d). Theamount of component (b) present in the compositions is preferably 35 to55 wt %, based on the sum of (a), (b), (c) and (d) components, and theamount of (c) present in the compositions is preferably at least 1 wt %and no more than 15 wt %, preferably no more than 10 wt %, of the sum of(b) and (c). The baked layer composition will preferably comprise theperfluoropolymers of (b) and (c), with the preferred amount of (c) beingno more than 15 wt % of the amount of (b) and constituting 2 to 10 wt %of (b). Preferably, the baked layer contains 2 to 8 wt % of (c) based onthe sum of (b) and (c). Perfluoropolymer (b) constitutes the remainderof the (b)+(c) components to total 100 wt %. The sum of components onwhich wt % s are based total 100 wt %.

The overcoat layer from the coating composition of embodiment Apreferably consists of an inner layer and an outer layer, with the innerlayer forming the interface between the primer layer and the overcoat,and the outer layer providing the surface of the non-stick lining thatis exposed to the environment, e.g. when the metal substrate is a pipeand the surface of the outer layer forms the interior of the pipeexposed to the fluids passing through the pipe. The compositionsdescribed in the preceding paragraph apply to the composition of theinner layer. Preferably, these compositions also apply to the outerlayer.

The inner layer formed from the coating composition of embodiment A alsopreferably contains filler (e), preferably having the platelet shape andidentities described for increasing the impermeability of said coatingcomposition, i.e. the baked layer formed from the coating composition.These fillers are mentioned as component (e) above with respect toembodiment B, and for simplicity, component (e) will also be used indescribing the use of filler in embodiment A. Preferably, the amount offiller (e) used in the compositions of embodiment A will be from 2-10 wt% of the sum of (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) in the coating composition,more preferably 3 to 6 wt %. In the baked layer obtained from thecomposition, the amount of filler will preferably be from 4 to 20 wt %,preferably 5 to 15 wt %, based on the sum of (b), (c) and (e). Theproportions of (b) and (c) in this baked layer will be the same as inthe baked layer of the composition that is free of filler (e). The outerlayer formed from the coating composition is preferably free of filler.Example 2 herein discloses the embodiment wherein the overcoat layer isentirely an inner layer composition, and no outer layer is present.

The coating composition is especially useful in providing an overcoat ofa non-stick lining of a metal substrate that is a metal pipe, especiallydown-hole oil pipe, sometimes called oil well pipe or oil productiontube. The lining forms the interior surface of the pipe. Dimensions ofdown-hole oil well pipe and preparation of the interior surface of thepipe for coating are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789. Generally theoil pipe has an interior diameter of at least two inches (5.1 cm).Another application of the non-stick linings made using compositions ofthe present invention is the smaller diameter metal pipe used in heatexchangers through which hot water/oil recovered from the earth,especially from extracting oil from tar sand deposits by steaminjection, is passed to recover heat expended to recover the oil. Thisrecovered heat is then useful, saving the generation of such heat. Suchheat exchanger pipe, often referred to as heat exchanger tube(s),generally has an interior diameter of no greater than one inch (2.54 cm)and as little as no greater than one-half inch (1.3 cm). As heat isremoved from the hot water/oil, these small diameter pipes areespecially prone to pluggage from solids (wax, asphaltenes, andinorganic scale, coming out of solution in the oil. It has been foundthat compositions of the present invention providing the overcoat forthe non-stick coating (lining) forming the interior surface of the heatexchanger pipe (tube(s)), greatly reduces or prevents this pluggage. Thecoating operation is also free of the intense smoking that arises frombaking of the overcoat layer composition when it contains the largeamount of component (d) needed to by itself provide the sloughingresistance needed prior to the perfluoropolymer (b) being melted enoughto retain the coating composition in place to form the baked overcoatlayer within the pipe.

Methods useful for coating the interior of a pipe with composition ofthe present invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789 and U.S.Patent Publication 2009/0078328. In the present invention, the non-sticklining will preferably have a total thickness of at least 75micrometers, more preferably at least 100 micrometers, of which theprimer layer will be 8 to 25 micrometers in thickness and the overcoatwill constitute the remaining thickness. Of this remaining thickness,the overcoat inner and outer layers each constitute about 30 to 70% ofthe total thickness of the overcoat, to total 100% of the thickness ofthe overcoat. Exemplary of inner layer and outer layer thicknesses arethe following: 30 to 60 micrometers thick for each layer. Generally, thenon-stick lining will be no thicker than 200 micrometers and theovercoat will be no thicker than 175 micrometers.

With respect to the coating composition of embodiment B aimed atimproving cohesive strength the compositions in this embodiment can useas component (b) any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having amelting temperature of at least 290° C. described above and as component(c) any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a meltingtemperature of no greater than 270° C. described above. In thisembodiment, the key components are perfluoropolymers (b), (c), andfiller (e). Any of the fillers described above can be used as filler (e)in this embodiment. Embodiment B is similar to embodiment A in that aprimer layer is required for adhering the layer formed from the coatingcomposition of embodiment A, there being no significant amount ofheat-resistant polymer binder present in the coating composition. Othercomponents as described with respect to embodiment A can also be presentin the coating composition of embodiment B. The overcoat formed from thebaked layer of this coating composition is preferably the inner layer ofthe inner layer/outer layer combination forming the overcoat asdescribed above with respect to embodiment A. In another aspect ofembodiment B, the inner layer forms the entire overcoat, i.e. there isno filler free outer layer as disclosed in Example 2.

With respect to amounts of components in the coating composition ofembodiment B of the present invention, perfluoropolymer (b) constitutesat least 70 wt %, more preferably at least 60 wt %, and most preferablyat least 50 wt %, with the perfluoropolymer (c) content beingcomplementary to this wt % to total 100 wt % for the sum of thecomponents (b) and (c). Perfluoropolymer (c) is preferably present inthe amount of at least 1 wt %, both based on the sum of components (b)and (c). Preferably, the amount of perfluoropolymer (c) is 2 to 50 wt %,more preferably to further improve cohesive strength, 10 to 50 wt %, andmost preferably 20 to 50 wt % of the sum of (b) and (c). The amount offiller will preferably be from 4 to 20 wt %, preferably 5 to 15 wt %,based on the sum of (b), (c) and (e). These compositions for embodimentB would be compositions of the baked layer and the dry powder describedbelow. In the absence of any liquid medium from the coating composition,the composition can be applied as a dry powder, wherein theperfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are powders as described above, having anaverage particle size of 2 to 100 micrometers, and the filler has theparticle size described above. The dry powder can be applied byelectrostatic sprayer as well known in the art.

The coating composition can be applied to any primed metal substrate,and an outer layer can be applied having the (b) and (c) compositionsdescribed in the preceding paragraph but having no filler (e) present,to complete the overcoat on the primer layer-coated metal substrate.Additional examples of substrates are the exterior of small diameterpipes, sheets for constructing equipment for which an inert, non-sticksurface is needed, and the interior of such equipment as tanks and ductsthat can be used in the chemical processing industry.

The coating composition of embodiment B can also be in the form of aliquid medium, wherein the liquid is organic or aqueous such as in thecase of the coating composition of embodiment A. The liquid content ofthis composition can be varied as desired, but generally the solidscontent made up of perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) and filler (e) willconstitute 20 to 60 wt % of the sum of these components plus the liquid.The proportions of (b), (c) and (e) can be the same as solids in theliquid medium as for the powder coating composition described above. Theparticle size of the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are preferably thesame as described for the coating composition of embodiment A. Examplesof organic liquids include those solvents that have a boilingtemperature of 50 to 200° C. as discussed above, including such solventsas butyrolactone, NMP, alcohols, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutylketone, hydrocarbons such as heavy naphtha, and xylene, furfurylalcohol, triethanol amine, and mixtures thereof. The liquid-basedcompositions of embodiment B can have the same utilities as the aqueousbased compositions of embodiment A.

Whether the coating composition is in the powder state or liquid mediumstate, the result after baking as described above with respect toembodiment A will be a non-stick lining on a metal substrate wherein thefiller-containing layer and thus the lining has greater cohesivestrength than if perfluoropolymer (c) were not present. The baking willtypically be carried out at a temperature of at least 375° C.

When the coating composition of embodiment B is part of an aqueousmedium and the resultant composition is used to coat a metal substratehaving a primer layer thereon, wherein the substrate is non-horizontal,such that the composition tends to slough off before theperfluoropolymer (b) melts during the baking step, it is preferred thatthe composition also contain water miscible organic liquid having aboiling temperature of at least 280° C. This liquid a can be any ofthose described above as component (d). The coating compositionpreferably contains about 2-15 wt % of the combination of (c) and (d)with respect to the sum of components (a), (b), (c) and (d), andpreferably the amount of (c) plus (d) is at least 3 wt % and does notexceed 7 wt %. The amount of (d) is preferably 0.5 to 3 wt %, and theamount of (c) is preferably 1 to 4 wt % based on the sum of thecomponents (a), (b), (c), and (d). These wt % s also apply when filler(e) is present in the composition. Greater amounts of perfluoropolymer(c) can be present to further improve cohesive strength of the overcoatlayer made from the composition. For example, the amount of (c) can beup to 50 wt %, more preferably up to 60 wt % and most preferably up to70 wt % based on the sum of components (b) and (c). While the minimumamount of perfluoropolymer (c) can be at least 1 wt %, preferably atleast 2 wt %, greater amounts such as at least 10 wt %, preferably atleast 15 wt %, and more preferably at least 20 wt % provide such furtherimprovement based on the sum of components (b) and (c). All of theseminimum amounts of perfluoropolymer (c) can be used in combination withany of the maximum amounts of perfluoropolymer (c) to form a range ofperfluoropolymer (c) compositions togerr with the amount ofperfluoropolymer (b) to total 100 wt % of the sum of these components.

The aqueous medium (a) of the compositions of embodiment A and of B(when water is present) is preferably 30 to 55 wt %, based on the sum ofthe components (b), (c), and (e) when present.

In this embodiment B, the layer thicknesses are preferably as follows:The non-stick lining will preferably have a total thickness of at least75 micrometers, more preferably at least 100 micrometers, of which theprimer layer will be 8 to 25 micrometers in thickness and the overcoatwill constitute the remaining thickness. Of this remaining thickness,the overcoat inner layer containing the filler (e) and the overcoatouter layer each constitutes about 30 to 70% of the total thickness ofthe overcoat, to total 100% of the thickness of the overcoat. Exemplaryof inner layer and outer layer thicknesses are the following: 30 to 60micrometers thick for each layer. Generally, the non-stick lining willbe no thicker than 200 micrometers and the overcoat will be no thickerthan 175 micrometers.

TEST METHODS

The procedure for determining melting temperature of theperfluoropolymers disclosed herein is by DSC (differential scanningcalorimeter) analysis in accordance with ASTM D3418-08. The meltingtemperatures disclosed herein are the peak melting temperature.

The dried coating layer (film) thickness (DFT) for primer/overcoat ismeasured using magnetic instruments as described in ASTM D1186.

The particle size for the perfluoropolymer powder disclosed herein isthe number average particle size as determined by the laser diffractionmethod in accordance with ISO 13320-1:1999 using the Microtac® 101 LaserParticle Counter, available from Leeds & Northrup, a division of theHoneywell Corporation.

Adhesion Tests (Autoclave Test and Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test)

Test panels of carbon steel 1.5″×6″ (3.8 cm×15.2 cm) are cleaned with anacetone rinse, followed by baking for 30 min @ 800° F. (427° C.) andgrit blasting with 40 grit aluminum oxide) to a roughness ofapproximately 70-125 microinches Ra. The coatings on the test panels areliquid coatings and are applied by using a spray gun, Model NumberMSA-510 available from DeVilbiss located in Glendale Heights, Ill. Thepanels have a grit blasted surface and are coated according to thedescription in each of the Examples. The panels are subjected to theAutoclave Test described below for determining adhesion quality in twoways, the difficulty in removing the coating from the test panel afterbeing exposed to the Tests and the degree of blistering within thecoating arising from exposure to the Tests.

(1) Autoclave Test

Adhesion of the non-stick coating of this invention to the interiorsurface of a pipe is tested using the Autoclave Test on non-stick coatedtest panels described above. The non-stick coatings are described in theExamples below and include a primer layer for adhering the overcoat tothe test panel, and an overcoat outer layer that is free of filler. Thepresence of this outer layer increases the danger of blistering in theAutoclve Test because of the greater layer thickness through whichabsorbed gas or aqueous medium must travel to escape from the coatingduring rapid decompression. The Autoclave Test is conducted using amodification of NACE TM0185-06 “Evaluation of Internal Plastic Coatingsfor Corrosion Control of Tubular Goods by Autoclave Testing.” Samples ofnon-stick coated test panels are prepared and suspended in a beakerwhere test fluids are added and then the beaker is placed into anautoclave unit. The unit is secured and gases are metered into the unitusing partial pressures. The heat is turned on and the pressure ismonitored until full temperature is reached. The panels are in this waysuspended in an autoclave containing two phases: 1) an aqueous phasesolution of synthetic formation water (formation water is water producedtogether with oil from the oil-bearing strata in oil wells; the ioniccomposition of the formation water is described below), and 2) a gasphase overlying the liquid phase, according to the following testconditions and composition of the two phases:

-   -   Temperature: 163° C./325° F.    -   Pressure: 58.6 MPa/8500 psi    -   Aqueous: Formation water (Na: 65,000 mg/L; Ca: 23,000 mg/L; CI:        150,000 mg/L; SO₄: 100 mg/L, HCO₃: 300 mg/L)    -   Gas: 16%, H₂S, 5% CO2, 79% CH₄    -   Duration: 24 Hours    -   Decompression Rate: as described in each example

A simplified alternative aqueous phase/gas phase for use in within theautoclave according to the above conditions is as follows:

Aqueous: deionized water containing 5 wt % NaCl

Gas: 1 wt % H₂S/99 wt % N

These alternative aqueous/gas phases used in the autoclave givesequivalent results with respect to the results obtained in the AutoclaveTest using the aqueous/gas phases first mentioned above. The alternativeaqueous/gas phases are used in the to obtain the Autoclave Test resultsreported in the Examples. This Autoclave Test is more severe than theautoclave permeation testing disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,789,wherein the test temperature is 122° C. (251° F.).

During pressurization and soaking under pressure, vapors from the gasand liquid media permeate into the non-stick coating and become the TestVapor that exits the coating upon the depressurization next described.After twenty four (24) hours, the autoclave is cooled to 93° C. (200°F.). It is then depressurized at a controlled rate as described in eachof the examples. This short time frame is used to simulate differentrapid decompression rates that might be experienced in actual fieldservice in downhole pipe. After depressurization the coated test panelis removed and examined within one hour for blistering change andadhesion in accordance with NACE TM0185-06.

Blister size is rated by comparison with photographic standards in FIGS.1-4 (in the standard) according to ASTM D 714-02 using the scale:

Blister size from 10 to 0 (10 being no blisters). Blister size #8represents blisters whose diameters are so small that they are barelyvisible with the unaided eye. Blister sizes #6, #4, and #2 representincreasingly larger blister sizes. Blister size #2, e.g. has blistersmeasuring 4 to 5 mm in diameter. Blister sizes #1 and #0 haveincreasingly larger blister sizes. These details on blister sizes aregiven to enable the visualization of these sizes without resorting tothe photographic standards, but are not intended as a substitute forreliance on the photographic standards for the actual rating of blistersize.

Blister frequency is D (dense), Medium Dense (MD), Medium (M) and Few(F). A blister frequency of None means that no blisters (Blister size of#10) are visible when viewed with the unaided eye

(2) Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test

Adhesion is evaluated by the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test wherein thecoating is scored to the metal in two parallel scribes approximately ⅛″(5 mm) apart. This scribing is done on the metal panels after beingsubjected to the Autoclave Test conditions. A knife blade in theninserted into one of the scribes in an attempt to lift the coating fromthe metal surface of the panel. The adhesion of each layer in thecoating system is rated as follows:

-   A (8-10) The coating does not release from the layer below it. In    the case of primer, it does not release from the metal substrate.    The only bare metal visible is in the scribes.-   B (6-7) Less than 50% of the coating layer below (or in the case of    primer, the metal substrate) is visible between the scribes.-   C (4-5) More than 50% of the coating layer below (or in the case of    primer, the metal substrate 1) is visible between the scribes.-   D (2-3) All coating releases from the layer below it between the    scribes (or in the case of primer, the metal substrate) when probed    with a blade, but remains adhered adjacent to the cuts made by the    parallel scribes.-   E (0-1) No bond exists between coating and the layer below it (or in    the case of primer, the metal substrate metal). Once the film has    been scribed, the coating releases.

Post Boiling Water Fingernail Adhesion (PWA) Test—

Coated test panels are submerged in boiling water for 60 minutes. Thewater is allowed to come to a full boil after inserting the coatedpanel, before timing is begun. After the boiling water treatment, thepanel is cooled to room temperature and dried thoroughly. The fingernailscratch test involves the use of the fingernail, to chip or peel awaythe coating from the edge of a deliberate knife scratch in the shape ofan X in the film, to test the degree of adhesion of the film. If thecoating can be pulled away from the substrate for 1 cm or more, thecoating is considered to fail the PWA Test. If the coating cannot bepulled loose for a distance of 1 cm, the coating is considered to passthe PWA Test.

Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test—

Coated test panels are subjected to a cross-hatch (x-hatch) test foradhesion. The coated test panel is scribed with a razor blade, aided bya stainless steel template, to make 11 parallel cuts about 3/32 inch(2.4 mm) apart through the film to the metal surface. This procedure isrepeated at right angles to the first cuts to produce a grid of 100squares in the coating. The coated and scribed sample is immersed inboiling water for 60 minutes, and then is removed from the water andcooled to room temperature without quenching the sample. Then a strip oftransparent tape (3M Brand No. 898), 0.75 by 2.16 inch (1.9 by 5.5 cm),is pressed firmly over the scribed area with the tape oriented in aparallel direction to the scribed lines. The tape is then pulled off ata 90° angle rapidly but without jerking. This step is repeated at a 90°angle to the first step with a fresh piece of tape, and then repeatedtwo times more again at 90° angles to the previous step, each time witha fresh piece of tape. Passing this Test requires that no squares beremoved from the 100-square grid.

Taber Shear-Scratch Test—

Before mounting a coated test panel on the Taber® Shear/Scratch Tester,the height of the scale beam is adjusted to match the thickness of thecoated test panel. A precision cutting tool, which is attached to abalanced and calibrated scale beam, is then placed on the test panel.Tungsten Carbide Contour Shear tool (S-20) is used for this test.Operated by an on/off switch, the turntable rotates at a constant speed.By changing the load on the cutting tool, the resistance to shearing orscratching of the coating can be evaluated. The removable scale beam isaffixed to the instrument by sliding it onto an adjustable gage blockshaft. So the scale beam can remain in a level position relative to thespecimen and turntable, the gage block can be raised and lowered. Bychanging the position of the sliding weight(s), the load applied on thespecimen by the cutting tool can be selected from 0-1000 g.

EXAMPLES

The primer layers formed in the Examples have the following pre-bakecomposition:

TABLE 1 Liquid Primer Liquid Solid Ingredient Wt % Wt % FluoropolymerFEP  12.5  40.3 Polyamideimide  1.1  3.5 Polyethersulfone  7.6  24.4NMP*  47.8 Other Organics**  20.1 Pigments  9.9  31.8 Dispersing Agent 1.0 Total 100.0 100.0 *NMP is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone **Other organicsmay include solvents such as butyrolactone, NMP, alcohols, methyl ethylketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, hydrocarbons such as heavy naphtha, andxylene, furfuryl alcohol, triethanol amine, and mixtures thereof. FEP:TFE/HFP fluoropolymer powder containing 11-12.5 wt % HFP, a having anaverage particle size of 8 micrometers, a melt flow rate of 6.8-7.8 g/10min measured at 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238 (5 kg weight), anda melting temperature of 260° C.

The overcoat inner and outer layers formed in the Examples have thefollowing pre-bake compositions:

TABLE 2 Liquid Overcoat Outer Layer Composition Outer Layer Outer LayerLiquid Solid 1 2 1 2 Ingredient wt % wt % wt % wt % Perfluoropolymer PFA 45.0  49.3 100.0  95.2 Perfluoropolymer FEP  0.0  2.5  4.8 OtherOrganics  1.9  1.9 Water  42.5  43.4 Glycerin  9.0  1.2 Thickener  0.7 0.7 Dispersing Agents  0.9  1.0 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FEP:TFE/HFP fluoropolymer powder containing 11-12.5 wt % HFP, and having anaverage particle size of 8 micrometers, a melt flow rate of 6.8-7.8 g/10min measured at 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238, and a meltingtemperature of 260° C. PFA: TFE/PPVE fluoropolymer powder containing3.8-4.8 wt % PPVE and having a melt flow rate of 10-17 g/10 min measuredat 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238 (5 kg weight), an averageparticle size of 35 micrometers, and a melting temperature of 305° C.The outer layer composition 2 is a composition of the present invention,and the outer layer composition 1 is a comparative example composition.

TABLE 3 Liquid Overcoat Inner Layer Composition Inner Layer Inner LayerLiquid Solid 1 2 1 2 Ingredient wt % wt % wt % wt % Perfluoropolymer PFA 46.9  43.3  89.1  85.2 Perfluoropolymer FEP  0.0  2.2  4.3 Glycerin 9.5  1.1 Water  34.1  43.6 Red Mica filler  4.4  4.1  8.4  8.1Thickener  0.9  1.1 Dispersing Agents  1.1  1.0 Other Organics  1.8  2.4Tin Metal  1.3  1.2  2.5  2.4 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

The inner layer composition 2 is a composition of the present invention,and the inner layer composition 1 is a comparative example composition.The FEP and PFA in both compositions are the same as described in Table2. The glycerin used in the compositions described in Tables 2 and 3 hasa boiling temperature of 291° C. The baking conditions are set forth inthe Examples.

Comparative Example FEP Primer/Inner Layer 1/Outer Layer 1

A layer of primer (liquid FEP) is applied to both sides of a carbonsteel panel prepared as described above, followed by drying at 150° C.for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is12-19 micrometers. A layer of inner layer 1 composition is applied overthe dried primer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 399° C. for20 minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. A layer of outer layer 1composition is applied over the baked inner layer to both sides of thepanel. It is baked at 360° C. for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 110-125micrometers. The baking of the inner layer results in considerable smokebeing emitted by the inner layer as a result of the volatilization ofthe glycerin. The density of the smoke is comparable to the density ofsteam in a steam room of a health club or the smoke from a smoky fire.

Example 1 FEP Primer/Inner Layer 2/Outer Layer 2

A layer of primer (liquid FEP) is applied to both sides of a prepared aprepared carbon steel panel, followed by drying at 150° C. for 10minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is 12-19micrometers. A layer of inner layer 2 composition is applied over thedried primer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 399° C. for 20minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. Very little smoke isemitted by the baking of this layer, i.e. the smoke is barely visible,because of its greatly reduced glycerin content. A layer of outer layer2 composition is applied over the baked inner layer to both sides of thepanel. It is baked at 360° C. for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 110-125micrometers.

Test 1—Autoclave Test with Slow Decompression Rate

Panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to theAutoclave Test. At the conclusion of and as part of the Test thepressure is released at a rate of 100 psia (0.7 MPa)/min. The panels arerated for blister formation. The panels are scribed with parallel cutsfor the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test.

Adhesion and Blister Test Results Test 1 (100 Psia (0.7 MPa)/MinDecompression Rate)

Comparative Example Example 1 PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters AdhesionGAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A AQUEOUS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A

As described above with respect to the blister size and frequencyrating, the blister size rating of 10 means there are no blisters in thecoating, and the blister frequency rating of “none” means that there areno blisters are visible. The meaning of the adhesion rating of A (nolayer release) is described above. This system of ratings is used in thetables below reporting the results decompression at different rates. Asis apparent from the ratings in the table above, both coated panelspassed the Autoclave Test and the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. Theblister and adhesion ratings are made after the decompression step ofthe Autoclave Test.

Test 2—Autoclave Test with Medium Decompression Rate

A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 areexposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. Atthe conclusion of the Test, the pressure is released at a rate of 300psia (2.1 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for theParallel Scribe Adhesion Test.

Adhesion and Blister Test Results Test 2 (300 Psia (2.1 MPa)/MinDecompression Rate)

Comparative Example Example 1 PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters AdhesionGAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A AQUEOUS #2(F) NR #10 (None) A

The coated panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the coated panel ofthe Comparative Example failed due to blister formation in the aqueousphase. The Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test result is not rated (NR)because of the blistering of the coating.

Test 3—Autoclave Test with Fast Decompression Rate

A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 areexposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. Atthe conclusion of the Test, the pressure is released at a rate of 1000psia (6.9 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for theParallel Scribe Adhesion Test.

Adhesion and Blister Test Results Test 3 (1000 Psia (6.9 MPa)/MinDecompression Rate)

Comparative Example Example 1 PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters AdhesionGAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A AQUEOUS #2(MD) NR #10 (None) A

The test panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the test panel of theComparative Example failed due to blister formation and adhesion loss inthe aqueous phase.

Test 4—Autoclave Test with Very Fast Decompression Rate

A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 areexposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. Atthe conclusion of the testing procedure, the pressure is released at arate of 3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallelcuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test.

Adhesion and Blister Test Results Test 4 (3000 Psia (20.7 MPa)/MinDecompression Rate)

Comparative Example Example 1 PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters AdhesionGAS #1(D) NR #10 (None) A AQUEOUS #0(D) NR #10 (None) A

The test panel of Example 1 passed both Test, and the test panel of theComparative Example failed due to blister formation and adhesion loss inboth phases. The blisters rated as #0 are in fact lose flaps of coatingexposing the underlying surface of the test panel, resulting from therupture of blisters.

Test 5—Autoclave Test with Extremely Fast Decompression Rate

A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 areexposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. Atthe conclusion of the testing procedure, the pressure is released at arate of 10000 psia (69 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallelcuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. The results are the same asreported under Test 4 above. The test panels coated according to Example1 exhibit a blister rating of #10 and Adhesion rating of A for both thegas and aqueous phase areas of contact of the coated panels within theautoclave. In addition to the higher decompression rate used in thistest as compared to Test 4, an additional challenge is introduced in theTest 5, namely the 3.8 cm×15.2 cm panels, instead of being flat arecurved having been cut from either a 3½″ (8.9 cm) outer diameter pipe ora 4½ in. (11.4 cm) outer diameter pipe, each containing the test lining.The curved lining is more prone to blistering and loss of adhesion thana flat lining that is characteristic of the panels used in Tests 1-4.When flat panels are used under the Test 5 conditions as in Tests 1-4,such flat panels also pass the Autoclave and Adhesion Tests

These tests show that the presence of a small amount of FEP in theovercoat of the formulation change has made a substantial change in theresistance of the coating to rapid decompression, at least up to 10,000psia. Preferably, the compositions of the present invention provide aBlister rating of #10 at a decompression rate of at least 300 psia (2.1MPa)/min, more preferably at least 1000 psia (6.9 MPa)/min., and evenmore preferably, at least 3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min., and mostpreferably, at least 10000 psia (69 MPa)/min. in the Autoclave Test.Preferably, the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test rating at each of thesedecompression rates is A.

Test 6—Falling Abrasive Test

The overcoat compositions of the present invention exhibit anotherimprovement, which is improved abrasion resistance. A separate set ofpanels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are tested forresistance to abrasion using ASTM D968-05 (2010) Standard Test Methodsfor Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by Falling Abrasive. Theabrasive used for the test is 24 grit aluminum oxide. The ComparativeExample requires 12.37 Kg of abrasive to cut through the non-stickcoating to the panel surface (substrate). Example 1 requires 18.49 Kg ofabrasive to cut through the coating to the substrate, offering animprovement of about 49% more resistance to abrasion. The improvement inabrasion resistance can also be expressed in terms of kg/unit of coatingthickness, the original non-stick coating thickness for both coatingsbeing 5.6 mils (141 micrometers). Expressed in these terms, the 12.37 Kgamount of abrasive corresponds to 2.2 Kg/mil (0.088 kg/micrometer) ofcoating thickness, and the 18.49 kg of abrasive corresponds to 3.3kg/mil (0.13 kg/micrometer) of coating thickness. The preferred amountof improved abrasion resistance for non-stick coatings made usingcompositions of the present invention and according to this FallingAbrasion Test is at least 20%. This Test 6 easily exceeds this amount.

Example 2

The overcoat layers formed in this Example have the following pre-bakecompositions:

TABLE 4 Overcoat Layer Composition Liquid Solid (baked) wt % wt % wt %wt % wt % wt % wt % wt % Ingredient 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Perfluoro- 46.9 43.336.17 22.52 89.2 85.2 67.3 44.9 polymer PFA Perfluoro- 0 2.2 12.06 22.524.3 22.4 44.9 polymer FEP Glycerin 9.5 1.1 1.4 1.31 Water 34.1 43.641.21 44.57 Red mica 4.4 4.1 4.25 3.97 8.4 8.1 7.9 7.9 filler Thickener0.9 1.1 0.82 1.28 Dispersion 1.1 1 0.45 0.42 agents Other 1.8 2.4 2.372.22 organics Tin metal 1.3 1.2 1.27 1.19 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 Total 100 100100 100 100 100 100 100The PFA and FEP perfluoropolymers are the same as described in table 2.

Overcoat layer 1 in Table 4 contains no FEP and is therefore a layer forcomparison with layers 2-4 that do contain FEP.

Preparation of samples for Adhesion and Taber Scratch Tests: Carbonsteel 4″×4″×⅛″ test panels are cleaned by baking 30 min. at 800° F.(427° C.) and grit blasted with 24 grit aluminum oxide to a roughness ofaround 70-125 microinches Ra. The panels are coated with the primerlayer composition of Table 1 (22 micrometers DFT), then coated with thecompositions in Table 4 (50 micrometers DFT for the overcoat). Thecoated panels are baked at 399° C. for 20 min. The overcoat compositionsin Table 4 form a single layer overcoat, i.e. the is no mica-free outerlayer applied to layer formed from the compositions of Table 4. Thepanels are subjected to the PWA and Cross-Hatch Adhesion Tests, asfollows:

For the PWA Test, all of the coatings showed no delamination or peel-offof the coating (primer plus overcoat layer) greater than 1 cm, therebypassing the PWA Test. However, the comparison overcoat layer 1 exhibitedweak cohesion within the overcoat, i.e., part of the thickness of thislayer is easily scratched away by fingernail.

For the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test, all of the overcoats including thecomparison overcoat layer 1, has no delamination between the overcoatlayer and the primer. However, the red color residue on the tape afterthe Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test is different. The presence of red residueon the tape, when the overcoat layer on the primed test panel stillexhibits a red color, indicates that the overcoat layer has failedcohesively, i.e. the tape is pulling the overcoat layer apart, leavingsome thickness of this layer on the primed test panel and some thicknessof this layer on the tape. The overcoat layer 1 gives a red color ontape peeled from the full 100-squares grids. Overcoat 2 shows a smalleramount of red color on the tape. For both these test panels, thered-colored overcoat layer is still visible on the primed test panel.There is no visible red color on the tape peeled from overcoat layers 3and 24 Thus, the improvement in overcoat layer cohesive strengthexhibited for the overcoat layers 2, 3, and 4 is as follows: Thepresence of a smaller amount of red color on the tape used on overcoatlayer 2 indicates an increase in cohesive strength as compared to theovercoat layer 1 having no FEP present. The absence of red color on thetape used on the overcoat layers 3 and 4 indicates a further increase incohesive strength of the overcoats in accordance with the result of nocohesive failure of these overcoat layers when this layer is subjectedto the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test.

The Taber Shear-Scratch Tests: The overcoat layer 1 is broken to theprimer at 600-650 g loading while the overcoat layers 2-4 are broken tothe primer at 750-800 g loading. “Broken to the primer” means that thecutting tool has scratched through the overcoat layer to expose theprimer, which is visible by not having the red coloration of theovercoat layer. The greater resistance to scratching by overcoat layers2-4 is another indicator of their improved cohesive strength.

Both adhesion and shear-scratch tests demonstrated that FEP addition tothe overcoat improves cohesive strength within the overcoat layer. Theprimer/overcoat layers 2-4 of this Example 2 also exhibit improvedAutoclave Test and Parallel Scribe Adhesion Tests results as compared towhen the Comparative Example compositions are used. To confirm thisfact, test panels coated with overcoat 4 (Table 4) are overcoated withthe same overcoat 4 composition, but omitting the filler component, andbaked. The resulting coated panels are subjected to the Autoclave Testand a decompression rate of 1000 psia (6.9 MPa). These coated panelsexhibit a blister rating of #10 and Adhesion rating of A for both thegas phase and aqueous medium phase contact areas of the panels withinthe autoclave. The same results are obtained when the overcoat has bothan inner layer and an outer layer and (i) the outer layer is overcoat 4of Table 4 but without filler and (ii) the inner layer is overcoat 2 ofTable 4.

The compositions of the present invention as an overcoat on a primedmetal substrate preferably exhibit the following: Pass the PWA Test,and/or no delamination between overcoat and primer and reduced or nocohesive failure in the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test and/or a TaberShear-Scratch Test load that is 10% greater than when no FEP is present.These results are preferably individually or collectively in addition tothe preferred results for the Autoclave and Parallel Scribe AdhesionTest results reported under Example 1 for the composition of Example 1.

What is claimed is:
 1. Metal substrate having a non-stick coatingcomprising a primer layer and an overcoat layer on said primer layer,said overcoat layer comprising melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b)having a melting temperature of at least 290° C. and an effective amountof melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature ofno greater than 270° C. to improve the rapid decompression adhesionbetween said primer layer and said overcoat layer, whereinmelt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) is a copolymer oftetrafluoroethylene and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether) and whereinmelt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) is a copolymer oftetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene and wherein the amount ofsaid perfluoropolymer of (c) present is 2 to 10 wt % based on the sum ofthe weights of said perfluoropolymers (b) and (c).
 2. The metalsubstrate of claim 1 wherein said layer of baked composition furthercomprises about 4 to 20 wt % of filler (e) particles, based on the sumof (b), (c) and (e), for increasing the impermeability of said overcoatlayer.
 3. The metal substrate of claim 2 wherein said filler (e)particles are platelet in shape.
 4. The metal substrate of claim 1 asdown-hole oil pipe or heat exchanger tube, said non-stick coatingforming the interior surface thereof.
 5. The metal substrate of claim 1,said overcoat layer further comprising filler particles for increasingthe impermeability of said lining.